![]() ![]() EDG is actually starting to struggle a little bit. Things are still confusing in the mythical land known as China. TDK is still playing with subs and is still winless so they are 10th again. And they lost to C9 anyways, so C9 edges them out for 8th place. Team 8 went 1-1 after barely beating TDK but that just goes to show you that Team 8 is struggling just as much if not more. The skies are still grim for Cloud 9 as they continue their struggles after going 0-2 this week. They have the raw talent, they just need to develop that talent. Enemy is a team that just needs more refining and more experience. Dig still has to prove they can stay at the top but for now they get 2nd place. Every other team seems to be stumbling in one way or another. What does that mean? Well it means Dignitas might not be as amazing as Dig fans would like them to be, but it means they are along with CLG the teams that make less mistakes. Now you might be thinking "Dignitas 2nd place?!" but do hear me out! Liquid went 0-2, Dig went 2-0, TSM went 2-0 but they could have easily lost both of their games, Gravity lost to TSM and TiP lost to Dignitas. ![]() While their gameplay remains somewhat of a mess, they are starting to get back on track. SK Gaming had a good week in terms of their record. They continue to remain in 4th place, unable to defeat the Top 3 (and SK) but beating everyone else. Unicorns of Love seem to be the new gatekeepers of the EU LCS. The more competition the better! But don't be fooled, the other reason why Gambit move up so much is because the teams below them had a rough week (with the exception of SK Gaming). While they still have a lot to work on, they are starting to look like a team now and that's great to see. Now all eyes are on the Fnatic vs H2K match-up. With H2K on the rise, they move up to 3rd while Origen slides into 3rd. This was definitely Origen's weakest week in comparison to their first 3 weeks. Let's go!įnatic vs Origen was a very solid match and Fnatic ended up victorious in the end. If you don't know how I rate the teams, go back to my previous blog post and read it. We argue that the physical origin of the extremely high occurrence rate of superflares in these stars may be attributed to the existence of extremely large starspots.I'll go with this title and I'll change the number of the week as I go along. There is evidence that these superflare stars have extremely large starspots with a size about 10 times larger than that of the largest sunspot. In the case of Sun-like stars, the most active stars show a frequency of one superflare (with 10 34 erg) in 100 days. We also studied long-term (500 days) stellar brightness variation of these superflare stars and found that in some G-type dwarfs the occurrence rate of superflares was extremely high, ~57 superflares in 500 days (i.e., once in 10 days). In the case of the Sun-like stars (with surface temperature 5600-6000 K and slowly rotating with a period longer than 10 days), the occurrence rate of superflares with an energy of 10 34-10 35 erg is once in 800-5000 yr. It is interesting that this distribution is roughly similar to that for solar flares. Using these new data, we studied the statistical properties of the occurrence rate of superflares, and confirmed the previous results, i.e., the occurrence rate (dN/dE) of superflares versus flare energy (E) shows a power-law distribution with dN/dEvpropE -α, where α ~ 2. ![]() As a result, we found 1547 superflares on 279 G-type dwarfs, which is much more than the previous 365 superflares on 148 stars. By extending our previous study by Maehara et al., we searched for superflares on G-type dwarfs (solar-type stars) using Kepler data for a longer period (500 days) than that (120 days) in our previous study. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |